Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upstream Delta Camp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete without prejudice. The entire text of this article is "Upstream Delta Camp (81°0′S 140°0′W) is located in Antarctica" and that's literally all she wrote so I don't think there's anything to merge. However if somebody does find sources and is willing to write a comprehensive article about this camp then more power to them. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Upstream Delta Camp

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I *hate* AfD'ing geographical articles - if it's a place, it's almost always notable. But there are exceptions. Upstream Delta Camp is apparently "in Antarctica". No searched online or in print seem to indicate any more than that. It's a place, but that's about all that can be said about it. Is that enough for an article - one that will never grow beyond a bald set of coordinates? Grutness...wha?  06:14, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I would support keeping if I could find anything of note about this place - that some notable expedition stayed there, that there is something worth saying about the geology or the wildlife, or something. Instead I find nothing.  It truly seems nothing more than three words on a map. Cullen328 (talk) 07:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * There is an article Antarctic field camps, which contains a list that this could be added to. All references I can find are for 1998-1999 and it seems likely that this was a temporary camp used for one season. Peter E. James (talk) 10:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Smerging it there would definitely be a reasonable alternative to outright deletion. Grutness...wha?  01:25, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Merging and redirecting to Antarctic field camps] seems most appropriate. Rlendog (talk) 17:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.