Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uqn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete recreation of deleted content, see Articles for deletion/Unhexseptium and Articles for deletion/Element extrapolation. Tim Vickers (talk) 01:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Uqn

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Claims to be important as a chemical emement, but doesn't give any sourcing, and says it's only a "hypothetical idea." Notable?  TheAE  talk / sign  21:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Element symbol which does not exist. WP:CRYSTAL. See also Articles for deletion/Element extrapolation and Articles_for_deletion/Unhexseptium for related discussion. -Atmoz (talk) 22:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I've corrected the spelling of the hypothetical element and added a reference. Normally I'd say move to unquadnilium and expand, but unquadnilium was deleted at Articles for deletion/Element extrapolation. However, it seems we could be covering the broader subject of names for undiscovered elements somewhere, and this should probably redirect to that article, whatever it is.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  00:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.