Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urbach Tower


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 03:12, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Urbach Tower

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

6-month old observation tower. While there are some decent sources, it is far too soon to say whether the notability will be a lasting. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:11, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Believe the article can be expanded. Enough resources out there. Give it time to be notable. Conlinp (talk) 03:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * "Give it time to be notable." That's not the way it works.  If it is not yet notable, then it doesn't yet get an article per WP:TOOSOON. SpinningSpark 18:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:08, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:08, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

KEEP Preponderance of sources indicate the building is a first and the technique used to build it as pioneering, making it notable.Djflem (talk) 20:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG, although not all of the above sources may be deemed useable, there are enough to show that this structure is wikinotable. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: notability is not temporary. Notable now, we presume that it will stay notable. UnnamedUser (open talk page) 03:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG, although not all of the above sources may be deemed useable, there are enough to show that this structure is wikinotable. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: notability is not temporary. Notable now, we presume that it will stay notable. UnnamedUser (open talk page) 03:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG, although not all of the above sources may be deemed useable, there are enough to show that this structure is wikinotable. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: notability is not temporary. Notable now, we presume that it will stay notable. UnnamedUser (open talk page) 03:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG, although not all of the above sources may be deemed useable, there are enough to show that this structure is wikinotable. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: notability is not temporary. Notable now, we presume that it will stay notable. UnnamedUser (open talk page) 03:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG, although not all of the above sources may be deemed useable, there are enough to show that this structure is wikinotable. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: notability is not temporary. Notable now, we presume that it will stay notable. UnnamedUser (open talk page) 03:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG, although not all of the above sources may be deemed useable, there are enough to show that this structure is wikinotable. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: notability is not temporary. Notable now, we presume that it will stay notable. UnnamedUser (open talk page) 03:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: notability is not temporary. Notable now, we presume that it will stay notable. UnnamedUser (open talk page) 03:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.