Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UrbanTone Records (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Deleted by User:Jimfbleak per G12. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

UrbanTone Records
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

After a bit of my own research, appears to fail Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. SarahStierch (talk) 06:49, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:57, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

 Comment I CSD'd the article, as it is directly copied from the company's website. Roster consists of a single, marginally-notable group. Distribution is through CD-Baby, which to me in-and-of-itself speaks of lack of notability anyway. 78.26  (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 16:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.