Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Rush


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Urban Rush

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Poorly sourced article about a television show produced by a cable public access channel, whose only wider distribution was on one small-market television station owned by the same cable company. And for sourcing, all we have here is one WP:BLOG entry and a post to the host's own self-published page on Facebook -- which means that the reliable source coverage that it takes to pass WP:NMEDIA has not been shown. Local programs like this can sometimes qualify for articles if they pass the RS/NMEDIA combo, but are not automatically entitled to articles just because they exist if they're this poorly sourced. Bearcat (talk) 17:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  23:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete, no sign of notability, aside from the fact that one of the host's last name is "Forbes". Speedy deletion! Scorpion293 (talk) 23:07, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.