Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban agglomeration


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Urban area. Spartaz Humbug! 08:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Urban agglomeration

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The same as Urban area, but without significant content. Batternut (talk) 15:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 16:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge into urban area. They both even use the same shot of Tokyo.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:11, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep; the nominator's not made a valid argument for deletion. It's a valid argument for redirecting the article to urban area, but "same as X, without significant content" is neither a valid reason to get rid of the history nor a valid reason to make this a redlink.  Nyttend (talk) 23:48, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to urban area would indeed be sensible. I see no reason for haste though. Batternut (talk) 07:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to urban area. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:00, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge to Urban area, because a great deal of information in this article is not in the Urban area article. Redirection alone will not really improve Wikipedia's coverage about the topic of urban agglomeration, but a merge would. North America1000 02:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.