Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban bible


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per G8 by MacGyverMagic. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 (talk) 13:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Urban bible

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable book Blowdart | talk 07:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

What do you mean by non-notable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shepshep85851 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * This AFD was previously unlisted; listing it now. JulesH (talk) 01:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't see any reliable sources about this.  Nothing in gnews; first five pages of google contain nothing relevant. JulesH (talk) 01:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete A Google search turns up nothing. Does not meet WP:BOOK standards. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as the most blatant spam I've seen in a long long time. Who cares about notability in this case? There is none, but that's beside the point--this is an attempt to turn WP into a billboard. Delete and troutslap. Drmies (talk) 02:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * We forgot to note that this 'book' isn't a book since it's not published. Aww, the website doesn't seem to be working either. In fact, it provides irritant pop-ups. Drmies (talk) 02:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, since when was the Bible urbanized? Tavix (talk) 03:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Tavix, dawg, wassup--you trippin'? Drmies (talk) 04:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (G11) — You've heard of spam, right? now this is the deletion of spam! Thou shalt not spam the hallowed pages of Wikipedia. MuZemike 06:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I had originally speedied it under db-web, but it was removed because someone assumed it as a book and they're not speedy candidates. --Blowdart | talk 07:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-encyclopaedic drivel. Is it snowing? Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Article was moved to Urban Bible and speedied there listing a (faulty) G7 and G11 as the reason. I agree with the G11 assessment, so I won't change it. -Mgm|(talk) 10:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.