Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban family dog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:08, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Urban family dog

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I wasn't sure whether to CSD tag this or not, so I'm putting it up here. UtherSRG (talk) 06:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

May 8 - We've cleaned up the copy, removed quotes from people. Can veracity be authenticated by a person? Joshua Geller, who is founder of Urban Family Dog, is now a prosecutor for the city of Van Nuys. He's been helping to tidy up. Would it help our case in any way to shorten this article? Nelsdrums (talk) 16:16, 8 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nelsdrums (talk • contribs) 15:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: no reliable sources; they are all from iTunes, the band site, CD sites, and the site of the article creator. Also, 0 Google News hits.  Goodvac   ( talk ) 06:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 06:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 06:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:COI. You need to provided independent verifiable and reliable sources. Your own website, iTunes, and amazon.com do not qualify as valid, nor do the other two references you've provided. You need to use hard news sources, such as national newspapers, to show that your group has notability. Otherwise, you're no more notable than the neighborhood garage band. - UtherSRG (talk) 04:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

I see the conflict of interest and other veracity problems. Perhaps if we are lucky, some fans will have the old L.A. Weekly review or some music magazine review from back in 2002 that they could photograph and upload. I respectfully bow out of the discussion.Nelsdrums (talk) 17:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete no reliable source references to the band=complete lack of notability.- Wolfkeeper  04:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Band it not notable. Can't find any good sources.  Traxs    7   05:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.