Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban housework (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-17 21:08Z 

Urban housework

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This page lists not one source, has just over 2000 ghits with the 2 of the top 5 being wiki pages. BJ Talk 03:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:HOAX and WP:NOTE. -- [|.K.Z|]  [|.Z.K|]   05:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. They're kidding, right? WP:HOAX. Realkyhick 05:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. This is easily inspired by Monty Python, and a clever idea, but doesn't belong outside of the BJAODN posts. --Dennisthe2 06:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Funny but delete Paul 22:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources are found. Very intersting topic though ^^ Zouavman Le Zouave (Talk to me! • O)))) 10:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.