Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban walks in Melbourne

Poorly written and in unencylopedic travel guide style. Whether Melborne is "safe and convenient" is a matter of opinion. This is an enclyclopedia, not a travel guide. One should look to WikiTravel to write about that. --Jiang 06:50, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, but send to Cleanup. I can see this article working quite well, but it would have substantially different - and encyclopedic content. Let us Melbourne editors work it out. Ambivalenthysteria 06:53, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * what do you see? sample sentence please? --Jiang
 * Detailed guides, as with the current state of this article, are not very encyclopedic, but I think creating a list of known walking trails could make for a useful list - sort of like List of Melbourne bus routes, but on foot. Ambivalenthysteria 07:03, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete if not substantially improved within 5 days. Maximus Rex 06:55, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Looks like it belongs on Wikitravel to me. -- Cyrius|&#9998 07:05, Apr 12, 2004 (UTC)
 * As it currently sits, yes. But I think there's definite potential here. Ambivalenthysteria 09:42, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - T&#949;x &#964; ur&#949; 15:08, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. BL 07:45, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Wikitravel.JimD 00:23, 2004 Apr 24 (UTC)