Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urbanist Architecture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per CSD G5 by. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:11, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Urbanist Architecture

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable article almost certainly created by an experienced SPA. All sources bar one are self-published or company profiles created by the company themselves. jcc (tea and biscuits) 15:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete As not notable. No coverage in independent reliable sources. The award (Best of Houzz 2017 - Client Satisfaction) isn't an exclusive award or one that's widely covered in the media; it appears to be akin to the way TripAdvisor gives stickers to any business that gets a high rating on their site. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:47, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:57, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. This article is an advertisement created by a paid-editing sockpuppeteer. Sockpuppet investigations/Delaykiller. —Guanaco 12:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.