Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urfanism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. DS 20:44, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Urfanism
There is only one link to Urfanism on Google, indicating that this is non-notable with no possibly of finding reliable sources Jeff3000 03:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A7. VSCA with no assertion of notability. --Daniel Olsen 04:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy per A7 and WP:SNOW --N Shar 04:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. &mdash;Brim 04:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. Smeelgova 04:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC).
 * This is a religion that warrents being listed on the List of Religions page of wikipedia (BHCMST)
 * Comment. Please provide evidence for this assertion. How many followers does the religion have? Where is the proof of this (independent figures, preferably from a governmental census)? Where is there a published reference to the religion? Etc. --N Shar 04:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete I'll see your A7 and raise you a G12. Much of the text is C&P from urfanism.com. Caknuck 04:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * urfanism.com seems to provide enough information to back up this listing. as long as they represent themselves well enough, they should be on the list. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.105.167.144 (talk • contribs).
 * Comment. Please see my comment above. Urfanism.com does not provide answers to any of the questions I have asked there, nor to others that must have answers before the religion is considered notable. --N Shar 04:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Also note that, according to WP:ORG, "Internal documents cannot be used as an assertion of notability". --N Shar 04:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. Ranks high on the nonsense scale, too. Anyone want to tag it with a speedy? MER-C 10:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and tagged as such via CSD A7. Wildthing61476 13:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm declining to speedy it, as I feel this is not about the group of people so much as it is about their philosophy. But I'll leave the speedy tag on in case another admin feels differently.  --  Merope  13:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, would speedy it but I'd like an AFD decision so it can be G4'd when it is (inevitably) recreated. NawlinWiki 14:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with NawlinWiki, let's run the full AfD to establish the precedent for G4. Still, this is unverified soapbox material.-- danntm T C 17:19, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * So I guess that religious cults based upon murderers can be listed on here, but not Urfanism? It was listed under Urfanism, which is its name, and was also listed on the List of Religions under NRM (new religious movement). What is the harm in that? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bhcmst (talk • contribs).
 * Comment - Please read the Wikipedia policies on verifiability and reliable sources as well as notability. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. -- Jeff3000 21:23, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 22:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.