Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urimai Kural (2010 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 19:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Urimai Kural (2010 film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - Urimai Kural is not an officially announced film and it was very very recently suggested through out the media. There is no official word about the film or its cast. Most of the information written on this article has absolutely nothing to do with the subject. This article should be deleted until such a film has officially begun filming or "inaugrated" (i.e. a film puja). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eelamstylez77 (talk • contribs) ) 21:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. It looks well sourced, but the sources don't support any of the main facts. The film is not yet announced, and principal photography has not yet begun (if it ever will), it was not covered by reliable sources. Fails WP:NFF. Amalthea  22:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —SpacemanSpiff (talk) 00:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * delete per notability requirements for films, films generally needs have reliable sources indicating the film is in principal photography stage before getting an article - in this this case the text claims that the film is in "home production". It appears doubful that "home production" is the actual filming of the movie, but it is impossible to verify because the claimed source is a dead link. -- The Red Pen of Doom  05:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Film doesn't meet notability requirements, as it is at most in pre-production.Tyrenon (talk) 10:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * STRONG Delete: The page is managed and poorly created by a blocked user, who fantasizes to create his own opinions into films. The original puppet, User:Thulasi12345 has been indefinitely banned, and this avatar has carried out scarily similiar edits preaching similiar views. Universal Hero (talk) 15:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * FALSE OPINION: I'm not the user your saying and I don't fantasizes. Enough with your idiot balmes on me just to make yourself so clever and popular. World Cinema Writer (talk • contributions) 05:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Popular? Who finds me popular? Actually, who here find me clever :) ? Universal Hero (talk) 18:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * User:World Cinema Writer sure does. :P Eelam StyleZ (talk) 01:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable as a film yet. Hekerui (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.