Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urizen (comics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Spawn villains. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Urizen (comics)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This does not establish notability independent of Spawn (comics) through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 01:58, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of Spawn villains. Not notable.  Does not receive significant coverage by independent, reliable sources.  Some of the plot elements could be merged into Spawn (comics), too. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:31, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  05:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete entirely in-universe perspective plot summary, no attempt at sourcing. Searches lead to the William Blake character/concept or to a similarly-named band.  No third-party coverage. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 06:17, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect, ping http://spawn.wikia.com/wiki/Spawn_Wiki to see if they want to transwiki content. There are so many other comic fancruft articles we need to purge... sigh. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:44, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 23:47, 4 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.