Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urobasican


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. DS (talk) 00:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Urobasican
Constructed non-notable language, prod tag removed. Appears to be entirely fictional.  Acroterion  (talk)  18:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete under WP:no made up things and WP:NOT. Begone. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 18:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per the article: "under development [since mid 2007] by a college student" Ahh, wouldn't it be nice if WP:NFT were a speedy criterion? Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. Maybe the author could set up a Urobasican wiki and post there.    Acroterion  (talk)  19:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. It looks like original research. Majoreditor (talk) 21:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete This is...nonsense. and should be deleted under Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Ohmpandya   ( Talk )  22:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable conlang. Æe  tlr   Cre  ejl  12:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.