Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urogenital papilla


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep as we occasionally like to allow collaborative editing here.  Jerry  talk ¤ count/logs 05:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Urogenital papilla

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Transwikied dictionary definition TexasAndroid (talk) 14:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as a valid stub capable of being expanded way beyond a dictionary definition. For starters there are about 1000 sources here and here which someone who understands the subject could use to expand the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment If it's kept, it needs serious revision--Phil Bridger's own links shows a) it's not limited to pigs; mention in fish is very common, probably even outnumbering mention in all mammals combined; b) when mentioned in mammals, it's generally in the context of determining the sex of fetal animals (including pigs, rabbits, and rats); it's not immediately clear that it's present in adult mammals. Chuck (talk) 05:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Yes, it needs revision, but that can't happen if it's deleted. AfD is not cleanup. If I had concentrated a bit more in my school biology classes then I would be able to have a go at fixing it, but I'd rather leave that to someone who knows a little more about the subject. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.