Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urs E. Gattiker

Was originally listed by User: Poccil for non-notability -Vina 08:41, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Was on clean up. Cleaners could find nothing to discuss.  We have followed our process, therefore.  The returning article provides no notability. Geogre 13:08, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm afraid IMO the procedure was not followed at all. Large sections of text were removed and a talk page did not even exist. Some of these sections were undoubtedly inappropriate and deserving of removal, but others if accurate do seem to establish notability. I've restored the list of publications, and a reformatted external link section. If these are all vanity, then we should discuss this on the article talk page, which is also where removed text such as this should go. Andrewa 17:02, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: random academic. Restored text doesn't establish notability. Wile E. Heresiarch 17:34, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * The available discussion describes someone who appears to be a fairly average academic. Delete unless further evidence of notability is presented during the discussion period. Rossami 13:31, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  23:55, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Del. Non-notable. --Jerzy(t) 04:05, 2004 Sep 9 (UTC)