Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uruguay–Vietnam relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 08:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Uruguay–Vietnam relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random country pairing. the one state visit can easily be covered in [[Foreign relations of Uruguay]]. LibStar (talk) 03:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * question I assume you have made a reasonably thorough search, according to WP:BEFORE? DGG (talk) 03:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I've searched google news, not much there, this shows a limited relationship LibStar (talk) 04:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - a Google search of Uruguay Vietnam doesn't turn up anywhere near enough to meet WP:N and there's no reason to assume that these countries would have a notable relationship. Nick-D (talk) 08:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - random pairing, no evidence of notability, one state visit is just news. - Biruitorul Talk 17:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Once again, a randomly created article that does nothing to assert notability in world affairs, and is not likely to be able to. -- BlueSquadron Raven  16:15, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep pending outcome of discussion at the Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 00:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * the above cannot be considered a vote for keep, it does not assess the notability of relations. LibStar (talk) 00:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The discussion at Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations is directly related to Wikipedia_talk:Notability. Deletion could preempt the result of the discussion which could see the development of additional criteria for notability. You have ignored requests not to continue nominating these articles for deletion until the centralized discussion on notability has been resolved. This behavior is rather disruptive. Martintg (talk) 01:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, per Piotrus. Martintg (talk) 01:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * the above cannot be considered a vote for keep, it does not assess the notability of relations. LibStar (talk) 01:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.