Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uruguay–Vietnam relations (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Weak keep is keep. Tone 16:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Uruguay–Vietnam relations
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Previously deleted. Fails WP:GNG. Could not find significant coverage. 3 of the 6 sources merely confirm embassies (or non resident embassy). The fact that Uruguay sells beef to Vietnam is hardly noteworthy given Uruguay sells beef worldwide. LibStar (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 22:33, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:JUSTAVOTE. LibStar (talk) 22:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: the page as it stands is useless. The previous version also said "In November 2007, Uruguayan President Tabare Vazquez visited Vietnam". Geschichte (talk) 10:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as I found additional sources, . EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 21:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment It's worth noting that even where a country has been identified as a priority for another state's foreign relations, these types of articles are being deleted: Articles for deletion/Spain–Tanzania relations. The simple existence alone of normalised diplomatic and trade relations cannot itself be grounds for an article; given that Vietnam accredits their Argentine representative, while Uruguay has a resident representative, as an ATD redirect to List of diplomatic missions of Uruguay, otherwise delete. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 22:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: a cursory search in Spanish had shown quite a bit of coverage in Uruguayan and Vietnamese that in my opinion satisfy WP:GNG, although I want to check if there are more. I will be posting those here in a bit. Pilaz (talk)
 * Establishment of diplomatic relations in 1993, celebrations and ROTM diplomatic stuff:, , , ; 2012 Uruguay-Vietnam framework cooperation agreement ; Uruguayan president promising to visit Vietnam in 2014 , , . A lot of bilateral discussions on a potential free trade agreement between the two countries in 2021 , , , , . I don't think I'm going to weigh on this yet, but there are also other sources and bilateral official visits out there. Will try to look into them later today. Pilaz (talk) 13:46, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Lean Keep (in between Weak Keep and Keep) - there were some other visits, like the MFA of Uruguay to Hanoi in 2010, the visit of the deputy PM of Vietnam to Montevideo, a 2014 scientific agreement , a trade and investment agreement in 2016 , so I think an encyclopedic version of it all could have its place in the encyclopedia. I think that should be enough for a start-class article. There was also a study that I read while browsing that covered Latin America-Vietnam relations and had two paragraphs about the Vietnam-Uruguay relation, but I can't seem to find it at the moment. Not seeing presidential visits, though, and that's why I'm only lean keep. On the economic front, we're well over the keep mark, though. Pilaz (talk) 18:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.