Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uruzmag Ikoyev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:51, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Uruzmag Ikoyev

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about footballer who made a single 93rd-minute substitute's appearance in a Russian Football National League match, and otherwise has only played in amateur or semi-pro football leagues. There is no significant coverage of this footballer in online English- or Russian-language sources (just database entries, match reports and transfer announcements, e.g., ). There is long-standing consensus that a nominal amount of play in a fully-pro league doesn't justify the presumption of notability in WP:NFOOTBALL when there is a comprehensive WP:GNG failure - as there is here. Jogurney (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - handful of minutes in a pro league, meaning he scrapes by on NFOOTBALL, is not sufficient with such comprehensive GNG failure. GiantSnowman 13:59, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete It is high time we rewrote football notability to a cut off above playing in one game.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.