Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Us Against the World (Coldplay song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Mylo Xyloto. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 06:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Us Against the World (Coldplay song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Song fails WP:NSONGS and WP:GNG. It is not discussed independently in third party media and nor has any notable chart action that a separate article is needed. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 06:24, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect if Background, Composition and more reviews can be found and included. If not, then Delete. (I must stress that the only charting on one chart is not a valid reason for nominating to delete and is completely irrelevant. Chart and chart position, even if it's number 99 South Korea or 200 in the UK, is perfectly acceptable. Charting is charting). —  ₳aron  10:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Redirect There is Mylo Xyloto, redirecting to studio album would be better because the song has been mentioned in some of the reliable references that have been added to the article. Delibzr (talk) 08:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 01:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:16, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep It ranked on the Gaon Chart which is recognized per WP:NSONG as being notable. Liam987  (talk)  01:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * True, the chart is a plus, but there are only two reviews. There isn't enough notability in terms of sources and information. The Critical reception section consists of just two critics. —  ₳aron  08:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Why is two not enough? Earflaps (talk) 11:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Two is nowhere near enough. You can't establish notability from two reviews. —  ₳aron  09:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * So, theoretically, a full review in Rolling Stone and NME wouldn't pass muster for you? Earflaps (talk) 21:07, 19 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect/merge to the album. There isn't really an article here and the fact that it charted somewhere can be mentioned in the album article. --Michig (talk) 08:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep in agreement with User:Liam987. SilentDan (talk) 07:57, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect Charting in Korea isn't as cut and dried as the article makes out. The chart is separated into 3 lists "Total" "Domestic" "Foreign" You can switch between them by clicking the buttons just above the ranking column. The song is only listed on "Foreign" and did not chart on the main "Total" list. Mattg82 (talk) 20:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.