Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UsedEverywhere.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

UsedEverywhere.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promo tone and failure of WP:NWEB. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:31, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Non notable. Limited local press coverage. Cowlibob (talk) 09:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Does this help? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bY4QHGz_iqY&feature=youtu.be&t=54s It's an old news segment on UsedEverywhere (UsedVictoria locally) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Almagordo (talk • contribs) 18:55, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 21:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as non notable website. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:09, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.