Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User El Coronado

Everything what is created by User:El Coronado: (his opera) is an elaborated prank. I can hear how he laughs. All his contribution must be deleted. Mikkalai 03:43, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * That was my suspicion, but I wanted community consensus before proceding any further. I still await other voices and opinions. You can go to the Demish page and click "What links here" to see the other possible nominees. Geogre 04:00, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I strongly suspect that most of this user's contributions are nonsense. Have a look at "United Socialist Union" (maybe it's related to the "Society for Redundancy Society"?) User:Antandrus 04:20, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete all contributions by User:El Coronado and ban permanently. It's a very lengthy joke. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:41, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * He's added his fictional person Anarcho Coronado de Murillo to several articles, and has even put him in Wikiquote. RickK 05:23, Sep 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * This is why I was so angry at the removal of these nominations. I felt that I was uncovering a pretty thorough-going misuser.  The Anarcho Coronado de Murillo article has been edited by many well-meaning and accepting Wikipedians, it seems, and yet it appears to be a solid gold hoax.  Again, I wanted some consensus before making moves. Geogre 19:28, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * From everything I've seen, concur. There is the off-chance that he added something legitimate along the way, but it wouldn't be worth the effort to find it. Delete all. And I would support a ban. -- Jmabel 07:00, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete/revert all past, present, and future contributions from User:El Coronado. Niteowlneils 00:26, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep and move discussion to RFC' - This discussion is not appropriate on VfD. You have not listed the exact articles individually for comment, and this should not be decided within the five day timeframe of VfD. Move this entire discussion to Requests for comment and deal with the user that way. I agree that this seems to be a problem user, but VfD is not the correct format for this discussion. -- Netoholic @ 03:22, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I want to list him at Requests for comment. By rules, someone else must second my "nomination", i.e., try to talk senses to him first. Mikkalai 01:32, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete as fraudulant and ignore unilateral attempt to limit discussion. Jallan 17:53, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Users are not deleted. Sorry. I confused allof you. I was talking about all his contributions. Mikkalai 01:17, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep! Userpages should not be deleted except for in extreme circumstances. Eric B. and Rakim 21:29, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Sure. But what about all his works? Mikkalai 01:19, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, of course, despite ridiculous attempts to keep this nonsense. RickK 06:38, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)