Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User created content


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to User-generated content (seems a likely mistake). Yomangani talk 15:10, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

User created content
Unsourced original research. If anything, should be merged with User-generated content. ZimZalaBim (talk) 11:19, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, but merge with user generated content. - jlao   0  4  11:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge. Pick one.  Each precludes the other, because of the requirements of the GFDL. Uncle G 00:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per nominator. Though frankly there's precious little to merge -- may as well just make it a redirect. Haikupoet 01:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - no encyclopaedic value. Nothing worthwhile to merge. BlueValour 03:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Spam for the Korean sites/companies in the article. There's nothing here to rescue. ("Recently it was born Ohmynews..."? I shudder to think what that means.) Krakatoa  Katie  13:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.