Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User talk:86.10.231.219


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was irrelevant. This nomination was misplaced and has been relisted on WP:MFD. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 07:20, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Is being used as an article really, and in the main to attack users. User involved has been asked on several occasions to select a username, but is adding to confusion by presenting the apeparance of one. May be a sock puppet in any case. Midgley 00:48, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:86.10.231.219&diff=41162741&oldid=41093728

Keep - this AfD is inappropriate & is not in good faith as is shown below. Please note:-
 * this AfD has come out of thin air - the applicant Midgley has not engaged in discussion to explain his actions in seeking an AfD
 * this User talk page is in proper use as a talk page
 * it does not satisfy any criteria for deletion
 * no evidence of "being used as an article" is presented (this talk page is in proper use as a talk page)
 * no evidence of "being used" ... "in the main to attack users" is presented (this talk page is not being used to attack users)
 * a third party user has already intervened over a prior "thin air" attempt by an anon (sockpuppet?) to list the talk page for deletion []
 * the third party stated in the edit history:-
 * "rv: user talk pages are not appropriate candidates for AfD; the nomination seems to serve no other purpose than to condone the vandalism of medical articles that the Invisible Anon has been countering"

And it can be seen this AfD is not in good faith because Midgley says "May be a sock puppet in any case" when Midgley knows very well that this is at static IP which I have been using for quite some time now - check the history.

The Invisible Anon 14:04, 25 February 2006 (UTC) & 14:46, 25 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - Midgley should have (and later did) nominated this on MfD instead of AfD. Can we get the AfD closed and sealed and let the MfD handle it? Michael Ralston 05:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.