Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Usher's New Look


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No valid rationale provided for deletion. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  18:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Usher's New Look

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The  Aven gers  01:31, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment:, what is your argument for deletion? You haven't written anything. Offhand the article is very unambiguously promotional to the point where it needs to be re-written entirely, but I am pulling up some sourcing like this article from Esquire. This Atlanta Journal-Constitution link is likely usable. I'll see what else I can find. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Coverage at Atlanta Daily World of an anniversary party. Also, this and this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:57, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Billboard, Madame Noir, Washington Post. I do think that this organization is likely notable and I've turned the article into a stub to remove the various promotional elements. However the question here is whether or not this could be summed up in Usher's article or should it have its own page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:08, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Usher's article in any case as this group may have gotten some coverage but it will be questionable if there's enough for a separate article as all of it will surely be connected to him instead, not about the group independently itself. SwisterTwister   talk  06:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per SK1, as the nominator makes no argument for deletion (or, for that matter, any argument at all) - and because they have now been blocked as a sockpuppet. - The Bushranger One ping only 07:16, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.