Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ushers: The Front of House Musical


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Ushers: The Front of House Musical

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a musical consisting of a huge plot summary and promotional text. Two sources, only one of which is about the article subject and that is a promotional press release. Searches do not turn up significant, independent coverage. Coverage is heavy on blogs, social media, and promotional pieces. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:53, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * An IP user has recently added a raft of references to the article, some of which are not WP:V. After reviewing these, they are, at best, WP:ROUTINE announcements of openings and one promotional piece that reflects some of the same verbiage as this article and are not likely to be considered independent or significant.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete It is blatant ads by a user who keeps posting them. Kill the ads. → (talk to me!) (contributions) 14:52, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. → (talk to me!) (contributions) 16:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. → (talk to me!) (contributions) 16:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. → (talk to me!) (contributions) 16:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:MUSIC and WP:MOVIE. The article does not pass Notability (music) or Notability (films) since the musical has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Also, Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. -  t u coxn \talk 17:47, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as my nom. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.