Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Using TCRC Tibetan Fonts In Ubuntu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 21:05, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Using TCRC Tibetan Fonts In Ubuntu

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:HOWTO and possibly a copy paste too. Shadowjams (talk) 10:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-encyclopedic content (Wikipedia is not a manual). It's an obvious enough case that I'd support an early close (as delete) if other commenters agree. - DustFormsWords (talk) 10:53, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as horrible. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 12:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * We should absolutely add an entry to the reasons for deletion: Articles that are just horrible. It would save time in a lot of deletion debates.  Maybe even a CSD criterion, who knows? :-)  - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:19, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * There's a lot of stuff one could start copy-pasting into the encyclopedia that can't get speedied as it is now...like, a grocery shopping list. Shadowjams (talk) 03:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per the above. Horrible might be a little strong, but I agree that it's unencyclopedic enough to delete outright. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like a how-to manual. Not encyclopedic. Joal Beal (talk) 19:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NOT. Joe Chill (talk) 02:03, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Probably someone somewhere wants this info - but they are more likely to look in a Tibetan or Ubuntu forum for it. WP:HOWTO applies here. Peridon (talk) 10:05, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.