Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ustani Jee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 21:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Ustani Jee

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This may be TOOSOON - there is one article from Dawn.com but one article is usually not enough for WP:GNG Seraphim System  ( talk ) 11:58, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Seraphim System  ( talk ) 11:59, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Seraphim System  ( talk ) 11:59, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Draftify for now. samee  converse  20:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Support Draftify Seraphim System  ( talk ) 21:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep its not TOOSOON and started airing and airs weekly episode and thanks to editors, they also added some sources, one can check on its page because may be viewership is high of this drama — Preceding unsigned comment added by YasraNaqvi (talk • contribs) 06:59, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:36, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep there is one source of dawn.com and other from Gulf News both are leading newspapers and remaining sources are also not invalid, drama only shows 1 episode till now but its not mean it should be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.44.3.139 (talk) 10:16, 20 April 2018 (UTC)  — 39.44.3.139 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Weak Keep & Comment - there has been some amendment regarding citations and tweaking of content. samee,  Seraphim System ,  Quality is still lacking, though it would certainly serve fine as a stub. Sources are dedicated, fairly minimal (but beyond the bare characters, bit etc - i.e. there is significant coverage), can't speak to bias (though shouldn't matter in this sphere) and quality - but seems unlikely any media would just make it up.Nosebagbear (talk) 10:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep although it contains very less information, it should be expanded i mean plot or nature of serial etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by SanamKhann (talk • contribs) 06:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.