Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utku Köse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Utku Köse

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fail WP:PROF. Still doing his PHD. Has got a fair number of Google scholar hits, but I don't think he makes it at the moment. Possibly WP:TOOSOON. scope_creep (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:Prof. GS cites not remotely enough for a very high cited field WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete as far too soon in our standards. SwisterTwister   talk  03:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a resume site. W Nowicki (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Subject is the author of a large number of peer-reviewed papers. The article includes about ten from 2016, but there are many others going back to at least 2010, one being cited by 72. I think he meets WP:NACADEMIC as having had a significant impact in his discipline. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Just publishing stuff contributes nothing to notability. It is citations to the work by others that counts, and a GS h-index of 8 is insufficient here. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC).


 * Delete. Citation record (in a high citation field) is good for a student, but not good enough for WP:PROF, and no evidence of any other type of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:Prof. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   09:40, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.