Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uttar Kumar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sing! 10:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Uttar Kumar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails WP:GNG and WP:BLP1E, has several UN-atributed peacock terms. And almost looks like is simply added to try and boost notability.. It just missed the mark for A7 speedy deletion.. GremlinSA 12:42, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:44, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:44, 13 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep -I'm not sure how BLP1E is relevant here. Well, Subject meets NACTOR#1 and GNG criteria. Sources, -Hindi sources -,, . English ones, -, , , . It may be a borderline case for GNG, but these sources certainly establish notability per NACTOR#1. He is not an emerging actor, but renowed actor per various reliable sources. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  19:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Hindi references do establish notability. Dainik Bhaskar calls him a "superstar" of his film industry, who has done more than 40 films.  Redtigerxyz  Talk 04:46, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.