Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utterly Hopeless


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (WP:SNOW) Huon (talk) 23:29, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Utterly Hopeless

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFF with no secondary sources confirming the commencement of filming. (A prod on these grounds was removed by an IP with the edit summary " ") The only Google result is a social network page about it, and given that the cast and crew all have the same surname and the budget is $250, I assume this is somebody's home video project. McGeddon (talk) 08:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Enough said, and true to its name. JWNoctistalk 08:30, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources come up, and, as the nominator rightly said, this is someone's home video project.
 * Delete As per above, trivial home video project, not notable Neiltonks (talk) 12:32, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete As much as I am a fellow Australian, yes I do think it needs to go as per above, but I do think we should congratulate HistorianAustralia for being WP:BOLD! Aoziwe (talk) 13:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. A yet-to-be-released short film destined for YouTube? Pull the other one, it's got bells onTheLongTone (talk) 14:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete as also imaginably speedy material, basically no context at all and nothing at all for notability. SwisterTwister   talk  20:55, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:39, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * filmmaker:
 * year/type:


 * Delete per failing WP:NF. If or when it is made and gets coverage, a return might be considered.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 22:34, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.