Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uvaizur Rahuman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 15:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Uvaizur Rahuman
The article does not appear to assert the notability of the subject and appears to be a sort of advertisement. I came upon this in search of an article to copy-edit, but besides the need for copyediting, there doesn't seem to be enough notability for Uvaizur Rahuman to have an article (also note that User:Uvaizur rahman has a small autobiography of himself in userspace instead). Cowman109 Talk 17:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Sounds like a nice guy, but I have to recommend Speedy Delete per CSD A7. Powers 18:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Heavens folks, the article asserts that he's a leading radio journalist in Sri Lanka, and has been on national radio there for 11 years. Also, he's been a cricket commentator for his country's national team (which is a big deal in cricket-playing countries).  NawlinWiki 20:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. Also WP is not a webhost for his resume.  Lack of sources and citations looks like original research, also.  Tychocat 21:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletions.   -- Sam Vimes 19:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, it is a resume rather than an encyclopedia article and despite existing since February, it has no references at all. -- Kjkolb 15:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, it is a resume rather than an encyclopedia article and despite existing since February, it has no references at all. -- Kjkolb 15:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.