Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uwe jarling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Uwe jarling

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Self-promotion. Is the guy notable? -- RHaworth 15:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment -Somewhat, it seems. 18,000 Google hits (with ""), and most of them are of artist galleries, shows, awards, ect. A couple are MySpace-y sites, so those wouldn't fall under the notability standards. Squ  eak
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions.   --  &mdash;Cel  ithemis  21:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless non-trivial secondary sources are added by end of this AfD. As is fails WP:A and WP:BIO Special Cases  Alf Photoman  20:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Weak Delete possibly notable, but does not at a glance explain notability for WP:BIO, This is a clear WP:COI. Danski14(talk) 21:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.