Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uyghur guest houses suspected of ties to Islamist militancy (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Uyghur guest houses suspected of ties to Islamist militancy
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

This was an expired prod with the rationale: "This page does not appear to meet the general notability guideline. Its notability has been contested since 2011, and it does not appear that the page has been edited in over three years". Alas, it has been at AFD before with no consensus. Geschichte (talk) 07:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Link to prior AfD is Articles for deletion/Uyghur guest houses suspected of ties to islamist militancy.      StarM 14:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not really sure what the article is about. Nothing notable. Oaktree b (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per the reasoning I provided in the now-expired PROD tag. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 07:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, Uyghur guest house is not an article, so I don't see how this could possible pass WP:GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Delete per nom. Mosesheron (talk) 19:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT and WP:SOAP. The page is not written well, with footnotes that go into excessive details, and is sourced too heavily to opinion pieces. I reads like a propaganda hit. Bearian (talk) 22:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bearian. — Kawnhr (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Delete per nom. --SalmanZ (talk) 11:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.