Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uzair Shah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  04:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Uzair Shah

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This subject fails WP:GNG as well as WP:FILMMAKER. One source for all 3 claims; two sentences; four images; zero facial indicia of significance or importance. This looks like a vanity piece. JFHJr (㊟) 04:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Journalism,  and Pakistan.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Good catch! this is an AUTOBIO created by a SPA, clearly fails to meet WP:N --— Saqib ( talk  |  contribs ) 11:10, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * This fresh catch belongs to Crosji, who brought this tuna to WP:BLPN, unfortunately the wrong venue. I just canned and shipped it here. Thanks, Crosji! JFHJr (㊟) 20:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Tasted fantastic! Appreciate the tuna, thanks — Saqib  ( talk  |  contribs ) 09:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. Agree. If there are more photos than actual written information in the article then it probably isn't noteworthy in the first place. Photos are probably to make the subject seem more notable than they actually are. Sadustu Tau (talk) 14:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. Agree. The brevity of the article precludes any critique regarding its quality. --Crosji (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.