Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uzham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. joe deckertalk 15:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Uzham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A quick google search indicates that there may well be a Mollywood film of this name, written and directed by Jeethu Joseph and starring Prithviraj with a release date of 2 September 2016, just as the article says.

The issue here is that there are no reliable sources that verify this as of 7 March 2016.

Always happy to be proven wrong, and no prejudice at all to the article being recreated when reliable sources are found. Shirt58 (talk) 10:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - if there are reliable sources indicating filming or other notability, I can't see them. Delete per WP:NFF, can of course be recreated if things move on. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:06, 22 March 2016 (UTC)


 * WP:INDAFD: "Uzham" "Oozham" "Jeethu Joseph" "Prithviraj Sukumaran" "Sreejith Ravi"
 * director:
 * star:
 * alt spelling:


 * Userfy as the film has is scheduled to soon, but has not yet begun filming. And to & ... under the proper title of Oozham, this production almost but not quite yet meets WP:NFF (paragraph 3). In my own WP:BEFORE,  I looked and found plenty of coverage.   I figure we can safely return this to article space in about two or three weeks, and I so strongly suggest a move to this more sourcable title. Either send to WP:DRAFTSPACE or userfy I'll take it).   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and Draft instead as mentioned because this is still simply not better convincing of keeping for now at best thus better improvements are needed. SwisterTwister   talk  22:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Draftify per Schmidt. The article is more likely to be noticed and improved in draft namespace, and the creator can work on it there too. North America1000 09:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.