Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uzity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Foradian.  MBisanz  talk 01:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Uzity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTPROMO, no assertion of notability. Of the five sources, three are not suitable for RS, (Foradian's own site, the Deloitte list, and the board changes in hindubusinessline), techcircle fails SIGCOV, and edtechreview has no editorial oversight (despite what it says); it's a "community of users." Most particularly, there's no indication anyone is using the product. MSJapan (talk) 03:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I myself PRODed but it removed with the apparent claims it was "notable" and the parent company was apparently "notable" but this is not so, because both I found nothing convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  03:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Foradian Technologies. I've recently edited the article on the company and its barely notable itself. I cannot find significant RS coverage on the product. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge to Foradian as preferred WP:ATD. ~Kvng (talk) 14:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Foradian Technologies. Notability not established. Insufficient coverage for a standalone article - most of the refs don't even mention Uzity, and the only one with more than a brief mention is the http://techcircle.vccircle.com which reads like a press release.Dialectric (talk) 16:36, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge to Foradian, which presently has mentions with no explanations. North America1000 08:07, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.