Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uzma Alkarim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation. North America1000 00:53, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Uzma Alkarim

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I found no significant coverage for this news anchor. SL93 (talk) 23:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan. SL93 (talk) 23:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment A one minute Google news search turned up the following: BBC coverage of her as a victim of crime, BBC coverage of an event she organised on feminism where no women were invited , albeit a quote, but covered in Daily Jang on International Women's Day 2018.

On those alone, not quite enough to pass the GNG, but more thorough searching would be helpful. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 06:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 03:45, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * STRONG KEEP, I have modified upto some extent ( and yes I can expand the article as well) with secondary citations removing all the primary citations. --- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 10:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The new sources aren't even about her for the most part and the interview is a primary source. SL93 (talk) 15:17, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.