Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vårdguiden 1177


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT#1. The nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion or redirection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:18, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Vårdguiden 1177

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Their main claim to 'fame' (and notability) is a recent controversy about their database being not properly protected, effectively a company version of WP:ONEEVENT. Other than that it seems that they fail WP:NCOMPANY/WP:GNG. BEFORE doesn't show much in English, and Swedish page doesn't go much beyond this incident either. Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  12:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  12:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - There is no such thing as a "company version of one event", but if there were the solution to it would be rename/redirect/merge to the notable event, because WP:1E is not a stand-alone WP:DELREASON. However, the February 2019 data breach is not the only incident in which this company has received coverage. There are also the scandal of their poor response times discussed in early 2018, the scandal of people seeing other patient's inforamtion in late 2018 etc. etc. etc. All reported in Swedish national media ON TOP OF the data breach exposed in 2019 - a clear pass for WP:CORP.
 * Keep - Per WP:CORP. Per sources.BabbaQ (talk) 20:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Let me contextualise: 1177 Vårdguiden is a core part of national Swedish health infrastructure, co-owned by the Swedish counties and municipalities through sv:Sveriges kommuner och landsting. The English article has a very unfortunate angle. The data breach was a big, national scandal given the role 1177 Vårdguiden plays, but it's not the one defining event. sv:1177 Vårdguiden has more information. Finding good sources online is slightly time-consuming given that it is mentioned all the time, so you'd have to go through a lot of material – 1177 Vårdguiden gives 22079 hits in sv:Mediearkivet (a media archive collecting a lot of, but not all, Swedish newspapers) and the shorter and oft-used 1177 gives 58143 hits, but as an example, see this article in sv:Dagens Medicin, the leading Swedish medical newspaper, where the Swedish national Minister for Health and Social Affairs says that the government's plan is that "everyone will call 1177" and that the government has given the municipalities and counties a sum of money to develop 1177 Vårdguiden to become the central starting point for health care in Sweden. /Julle (talk) 11:58, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I have tried to very briefly explain this in the article in just a few words, adding the Dagens Medicin article as the source. There's a lot more that could be done here. /Julle (talk) 12:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - Per sources. Per WP:CORP.BababiBa (talk) 16:55, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Withdraw. I accept that Swedish-speaking editors have found sufficient source to suggest this can be expanded and meet NCORP/GNG. Thanks for finding sources and explaining the wider context. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.