Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vídeo Brinquedo (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Vídeo Brinquedo
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm not terribly convinced about the notability of thiscompany. Of the sources, almost all are directory listings from Allmovie, primary sources, trivial mentions like this in a newspaper blog, or this which based on my knowledge of Portuguese seems to be non-trivial, but it's the only non-trivial source. I've seen many accustations about this company, and while this isn't quite a G10 level, I still don't see anything to save it. Was kept at last AfD based entirely on WP:GOOGLEHITS. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 03:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I tried to renovate the article but after a while I just gave up. You're right, it's not notable. : P –  J U M P G U R U   ■ ask ㋐㋜㋗ ■ 03:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Keep: The translated version of the ministry of culture website seems enough to establish notability for the company: 350,000 dvd units and the accusation of plagiarism. --Jmundo (talk) 04:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete: agree with nominator, non-notable company WP:CORP. JamesBurns (talk) 01:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:CORP at 20 000 feet. Deletion arguments seem disconnected from facts, not sure what to say about that.  Odd. Wily D  12:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.