Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V-zine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 10:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

V-zine

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Uh, it's a website. Or a CD. But definitely a buzzword – none of which makes it a notable definition. 9Nak (talk) 18:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete looks awfully spammy to me. DarkAudit (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Beyond uncyclopedic, non-notable, and overall unneeded.  Two One Six Five Five  τʃ 18:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete- per all above. AndreNatas (talk) 18:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 20:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. – ukexpat (talk) 21:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Came across this via Special:Random and would have nominated it myself. I was too slow, so am offering my vote instead. Callmederek (talk) 21:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, Neo-spamcruftisement. --Dhartung | Talk 22:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEOLOGISM. -- Shark face  217  03:21, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to fail the WP:NEO notability criteria. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.