Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V.F.W Playfield Wyandotte MI


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Wyandotte, Michigan. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 03:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

V.F.W Playfield Wyandotte MI

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable local park. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as vandalism, and SNOW close. The creator is a puppetmaster who is attempting to use Wikipedia as a data repository for an app he is building, and he has created and re-created many such pages. — swpb T 15:15, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment The create is not a puppetmaster. The three accounts are different students in the same class who are building an app as a school project. Their page creations are ill-advised, but not malevolent. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:26, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete While I do not think that the edits are malevolent, this should not be on Wikipedia. Delete it for now until we can work something out with the students. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:06, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge into Wyandotte,_Michigan as I just did with the related article in the WAA Park in the same town. These aren't malicious creations, and it's a waste to lose this innocuous research. Invalid as a standalone article, but seems perfectly serviceable as a line or two in the overall article on the location. -- Euryalus (talk) 20:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment the students are being treated to a good lesson on how welcoming Wikipedia is for good faith additions that don't meet our (less than obvious to the outsiders) norms. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge I suppose as I'm not entirely confident this would be a better article for the future, but it's not an explictly needed deletion either. SwisterTwister   talk  04:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.