Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V.I.N.CENT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Black Hole. History not retained as there was no useful sourced content to incorporate. Cirt (talk) 18:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

V.I.N.CENT

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its film. Without non-trivial coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 16:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Black Hole as a likely search term. Does not establish outside notability from film. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 16:44, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Pure plot for a one-time character. – sgeureka t•c 21:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-plausible search term. Fails to establish individual notability outside the main movie article.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 22:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as unimportant--certainly not enough for a stand alone article. I see no arguments here against that. DGG (talk) 23:30, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to The Black Hole where character has its notability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Evidently notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 07:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, but the robot is not notable outside his universe. So a merge improves Wiki.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- raven1977 (talk) 05:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- raven1977 (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing cited, so nothing to merge, and no point redirecting as it's an implausible search term. Stifle (talk) 17:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.