Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V.S.S.E.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 00:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

V.S.S.E.

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

An article about a fictional organization that fails WP:FICT and WP:NOT. It's written in an entirely in-universe style that does not show any real-world impact or such that WP:FICT requires. Besdies that, the plot sections of each respecitve Time Crisis game adequately cover the roles of the V.S.S.E quite well. Taking it to AFD because a certain "anonymous" user objected to it. hbdragon88 21:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - VSSE stands for a suprising number of things when googling. But there are no reliable sources writing about them. -- Whpq 16:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * VERY STRONG Keep &mdash;It's the only way to avoid having to make this "Major Characters" page of a video game overly long. 71.57.74.109 01:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Why need a long list of characters? Okay.  I just read the article, and it seriously violates WP:WAF.  They seem like huge long biographies even though their roles are extremely unimportant in the big picture – what else do you need to know besides the fact that they are agents?  It's not necessary to understand the plot. hbdragon88 23:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions.   --Gavin Collins 09:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as extensive list of primary sources is no substitute for reliable secondary sources as evidence of notability for this fictional covert organisation. The long in universe plot summary does not help either. --Gavin Collins 09:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above. &mdash;ScouterSig 15:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.