Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V.U.E.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Cel e stianpower háblame 22:41, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

V.U.E., Vuer Marking
tagged as speedy, but does not fit criteria. Unverifiable. &Euml;vilphoenix Burn! 02:02, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The discussion on Talk:V.U.E. tells us that this "clandestine sport" is too secret for Wikipedia. Delete. Uncle G 11:26, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- howcheng  [ talk &#149; contribs &#149; web ] 20:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete with regret, since it sounds both plausible and, if true, rather notable. But it just isn't verifiable.  The articles will, of course, be recreatable if verifiable evidence does materialise in future, so it's not like we're losing anything permanently by deleting them now. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 21:17, 25 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.