Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V. K. Adarsh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:13, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

V. K. Adarsh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article V. K. Adarsh is not a notable person. Most links are also not about the person (those are of some blogging website URLs),and cannot even find any articles related to person on Newspapers, which may or may not be notable. There is nothing about this person which makes him notable. 137.97.11.103 (talk) 18:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC) -- Nomination on behalf of an anonymous user. – Uanfala 19:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet WP:BIO written as WP:PROMO and does not have WP:CS--EC Racing (talk) 19:25, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 21:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 21:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Not important/notable! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abrasapuentes (talk • contribs) 21:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete being a "social media evangelist" isn't a notable reason.Willard84 (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment. He's received the state government's Science Journalism Award. Is this significant? – Uanfala 10:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No, that is not a significant award.2405:204:D485:1080:24F9:C7B7:26B7:292D (talk) 16:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a notable person, fails WP:BIO and URLs pointed to his blog and shopping cart websites. 122.174.250.10 (talk) 14:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * There's something distinctly disconcerting in this sudden appearance of several IPs voting for the deletion of an obscure article. – Uanfala 20:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)