Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V. R. Senior Secondary Public School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  00:50, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

V. R. Senior Secondary Public School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable school. Fails WP:NSCHOOL, WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORG.  Peter Ormond &#128172;  15:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete having a source that mentions the achievements of one student on an exam is not sufficient to show the school is notable. I searched for other sources and came up with nothing. There was a lot of noise, mainly getting hits on Virtual reality and schools, but also gettings hits on totally different schools named after V.R. something, or something V.R. I have to admit that I am beginning to think that vast majority of secondary schools are not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.