Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VEGAS.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 21:28Z 

VEGAS.com

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources given, no notability established. Despite some cleanup efforts it still qualifies as self-promotory spam. Jvhertum 20:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * delete reads as spam. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 22:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as spam. --MaNeMeBasat 08:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per new edits Speedy delete . - grubber 17:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Can someone point out how this does not meet WP:WEB?  Reading as spam is a cleanup tag and not a deletion criteria.  Yes, I'm doing more cleanup, but there is so much information on the net about this company that it will take forever to sort through.  There are over 750,000 google mentions so finding the best references will take time.  The company president or the company have been covered in numerous publications. It is large, popular and well known.  Vegaswikian 05:36, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for improving the article, Vegaswikian. I am withdrawing my nomination and changing my vote to keep - Jvhertum 16:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.