Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VEISHEA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Bushranger One ping only 03:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

VEISHEA

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable carnival at Iowa State. I'm sure it's fun, but it's not even close to being notable. No third party sources to show notability. GrapedApe (talk) 03:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Aren't there adequate sources? --Bonkers The Clown (talk) 07:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * They are all either WP:SELFPUB or sources connected to the university. These fail WP:GNG, which requires a demonstration of multiple third party sources on the topic.  The University ones, while they may be reliable, are not third party sources.  See the "nutshell" of WP:N, which states that notability requires that the subject has "gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large." A college newspaper reporting on a college parade isn't sufficient for that standard.  If it were, every single tiny club at a university would be notable, because college newspapers report on everything--GrapedApe (talk) 11:29, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:01, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:19, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – This topic certainly passes WP:GNG:, , , , , , , , . Also, per WP:NRVE, topic notability is about the availability of significant coverage in reliable sources, and not based upon whether or not sources are present in articles. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:21, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Please follow WP:BEFORE to avoid pointless AFDs and the problem of notable articles being deleted by mistake. Significant coverage has been found.   D r e a m Focus  05:14, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.